In summary I would like to strenghten a little more soil underfoot reason. Alas, in transerfinge so a lot of incredible that it is necessary to explain permanently to reason that all it is really real.
Whatever model has been taken as a principle transerfinga, its principles will remain valid. In other words, all these principles are invariant in relation to model. And the major principle consists that radiating of our thoughts renders not only indirect, but also direct influencing on the actuality enclosing us. The official science is failed to admit till now this fact as experimental verification brings ambiguous effects. But we need to solve the problems now, instead of to wait, when scientists will tell the loaded word.
All of us have got used to that our world obeys the law causality when any consequence has the base. The parent usually is perceived as a certain activity. But the matter is that thoughts of the person it is accepted to consider only in the capacity of manuals to its subsequent activities instead of as material radiating, capable to influence world around. And nevertheless facts are stubborn things.
Inexplicable implications of operation of exterior notion could not be completely ignored a science. The well-known Swiss psychiatrist Charles Young researched the appearances connected to interplay of thoughts and a material reality. It has analyzed hundreds strange occurences which one proved as the incomprehensible concurrences which have been not caused by the visible parents. Young has spotted such concurrences by the term sinhronistichnost. In lecture "About sinhronistichnosti" it reduces one classic example from the practice.
"On April, 1st, 1949, in the morning I have skidded a placard containing a fashion of a semifish-semiperson in the notepad. For a lunch to me have gived a fish. In talk someone has mentioned custom to make of somebody" an April fish ". In the afternoon one of my former patients whom I did not see some months, has demonstrated me some impressive patterns with images of fish. In the evening to me have demonstrated a chunk of a gobelin tapestry with the marine monsters figured on it and fish. For following morning I have met the former patient who was for the last time at me on reception ten years ago. This night the fish has dreamt it. Some months later when I have included this event in one of the operations and have just concluded its specification statement, I have quitted the dwelling to loch, on that place where I already some times have visited within this morning. This time I have discovered on a wave absorber a fish in length of centimetres in thirty. As nearby was nobody, I had no submission how it here has got".
I can not be retained not to give one more fragment from Young lecture, on the parent about which one you learn later. He writes: "I could tell to you great variety of such stories which one, basically, are no more surprising or incredible, than the irrefutable effects gained by Rhine (experiences with ekstrasensornym perception, for example, guessing of cards mean. — a comment of the author), and you soon will fathom that almost each event demands an individual explanation. But the causal explanation, unique from the point of view of a natural science, appears inconsistent because of mental relativity of room and a time which one are mandatory conditions of cause-effect relations.
The heroine of this history is the young patient who, despite mutual efforts, has appeared psychologic folded. Difficulty consisted that she considered herself as the most expert on any problem. Its dazzling formation has yielded to it "weapon" ideally suited for this purpose, namely slightly purified carthusian rationalism, from it is faultless "geometrical" idea of a reality. After several barren tryings to "dilute with" its rationalism with a little more human thinking I has been forced to be restricted to hope of any unexpected and irrational event, of something that will carry an intellectual retort in which one it has sealed up herself.
And here once I sat opposite to it, a back to a window, listening to a flow of its rhetoric. This night she was visited by an impressive dreaming in which one someone has yielded her of a gold scarab — valuable product of jeweller art. She still told to me this sleep when I have heard silent knocking in a window. I was enveloped and have seen major enough hexapod who fought about glass, explicitly trying to penetrate from street into a dark room. To me it seemed to very strange. I have there and then unclosed a window and have caught a hexapod as soon as it has flown in a room. It was skarabeevidnyj the beetle or a dor ordinary which one yellow-green painting very much bore a strong resemblance to bloom of a gold scarab. I have drawn through the beetle to my patient with words: "Here your scarab". This event has knocked a desirable gap in its rationalism and has broken ice of its intellectual resistance. Now treatment could bring satisfactory effects ".
And so, after half an hour after I reflected on Young beetle and thought, a leah to include to me it in the capacity of an example, to me in a window the Wanderer of rather imposing appearance has flown. It was the beetle similar by description on aforementioned. Want — believe, want — is not present. It is necessary to admit, in spite of the fact that similar visits happen extremely rarely, it at all has not surprised me. But at all because I have got used to concern easy to appearances sinhronistichnosti. Vice-versa, absorbed by the speculations, I have not attached this event absolutely any meaning. I have mechanically exhausted the beetle in an air vent that he did not search for it. And only and it came to pass, I was terrified: My God, what I the idiot! How much time exterior notion declares to me the presence, as much time I from surprise widely uncover the eyes. After all I slept a deep waking dream, when me very much bothered to demonstrate a character. Be I superstitious, I would consider it as a sign from above. Can introduce itself as people permanently sleep in reality and do not note obvious implications of exterior notion.
Similar examples there is a great variety. From the point of view transerfinga the situation here is quite clear: rendition on occasion causes a heavy gust of a wind of exterior notion. But Young does not hurry up to make an ultimate output that has served as the parent of concurrences: thoughts have formed events or thoughts have resulted from not realised presentiment of events. On the one hand, he says that "thoughts have created a bottom for a serial of fortuitous events", and with another — "it is sometimes difficult to be retouched from impression that the presentiment of offensive of a serial of specific events" occurs.
In the operation "Sinhronistichnost: akauzalnyj uniting principle" (1960) Young has spotted sin-hronistichnost as "simultaneous offensive of a certain mental state and one or several events of an external world having significant parallels with a subjective state at present". Young longly was not solved to publish the transactions because the appearance sinhronistichnosti was not laid down in frameworks of conventional scientific thinking.
Young makes indefinite, but courageous enough to measures of a conventional science an output. "Sinhronistichesky phenomena demonstrate a capability of simultaneous semantic equivalence heterogeneous, the processes causally not connected with each other; differently, they demonstrate that the contents perceived by the look-out can be introduced at the same time any external event, and without any causal relationship. It follows from this that or the loony it is allocated out of room, or the room is related (is connected) with the loony".
Apparently, any transgression of causality here is not present. The parent is available always, primely gear of interplay of thoughts and a surrounding is displayed implicit and while inexplicably. That is at the bottom in sinhronistichnyh concurrences: events are shaped by thoughts or thoughts originate as a presentiment of events? From the point of view transerfinga occurs both that and another. The soul gains access to the data which are in the field of the information which one then can be interpreted by reason. The reason, in turn, shapes thoughts which one souls in the presence of unity and reason can be embodied in material implementation. Here these standings also base model transerfinga. But I besides underline that the model of alternatives does not claim for the exact specification statement of the world, and forms only starting basis, the base for understanding of principles. We know about this world more few. But it does not hinder us to use principles transerfinga. And that they work, you can be convinced.
All appearances connected to action of mental energy on world around, it is possible to justify the theorem of John Bell known from quantum physics which one sounds as follows: "there are no unerthed systems; each fragment of the Universe is in" with instant "(exceeding the speed limit light) connections with all remaining fragments. All System even if its parts are partitioned in huge spacing intervals, operates as Uniform System". The yielded theorem is demonstrated idealised and has already discovered practical confirmations. However, "the instant connection" is included in the contradiction with a special theory of relativity which one states that energy cannot be spread more promptly light. Nevertheless the theorem occurs to be.
Then exterior notion does not submit to a theory of relativity. Generally, the quantum physics bases on unprovable postulates. It means that it too represents certain model. And not clear contradictions there not one, but the whole flock. It once again affirms that it is not necessary to attach great value of model. Also it is necessary to mark, Young ideas have discovered a support at founders of modern physics — Wolfgang Pauli and Albert Einstein. However, was quite interquartile that process of a transmission of information does not concern energy generally, therefore there can be more promptly light speeds.
In model of alternatives also it is possible to discover contradictions, but nevertheless she explains much. The model of alternatives if does not eliminate, then "smooths" some known paradoxes of room and a time. Till now we considered relocation for other lines of life with sync on a time. Life lines were always parallel to a time axis. In other words, passage was performed always from one point of a time in the same point.
Now fancy two lines of life, nonparallel concerning a time axis. Footprint of satellite beams of the same point of these lines to a time axis will lie in miscellaneous places. Passage in between means relocation in a time in the past or the future depending on a direction of inclination. The relative steepness of a declination spots distance of relocation in a time.
Analogously, if two lines of life are not parallel concerning the selected shaft of room, passage will mean in between instant (or it is unreal prompt) relocation in room. A steepness and a direction of inclination of lines spots distance and a direction of travel. This rasping enough explanation, but is quite reasonable to our understanding.
The caustic Reader can mind: well and how to be with paradox of violation of cause-effect relations at travelling to a time? We will admit, I am moved to the past till the birth and there… Brutally I slay the parents. How I then was born? The yielded paradox within the limits of model of alternatives is only apparent. On that line of life I really cannot be born. Well also what? After all I was born on other line. I will resemble, there is an infinite set of lines of life — alternatives where I am and where I was not present. The most blood-thirsty fan of paradoxes can even be displaced to the childhood, there meet itself and settle innocent making. But in this case it will meet not with itself(himself), and implementation of the separate alternative which one exists along with various others.
The past really cannot be modified, it already happens. But it happens not only because there was an implementation of the transited cut of a line of life that is why that alternatives of the past events are more narrow and so existed. In this sense it is possible to tell about the future also that it already happens. Therefore cause-effect relations are not upset at passage from one line of life on another. You can take a film and cross out one frame, but the subsequent frames will not suffer from it. The time is static. Only implementation of alternatives on a line dynamic changes. Maculae light from a small lamp in dark to working scaffolds is in the same way moved.
That is really impossible, so this relocation in the past or the future on the same line of life. Paradoxes just occur only in this case. A leah not therefore forecasts of clairvoyants are rather approximate, and is frequent and are erratic? Clairvoyants are capable to scan future cuts somehow. If scanned cuts lie on other lines of life then inaccuracies in forecasts are easily explainable. According to model of alternatives the further one line from another will defend, the differences in the scenario are stronger.
Scientists are reduced in bewilderment by a fashion of driving of UFO: an instantaneous acceleration, blowing-down, subitaneous gang of a direction at right angle. Taking into account inactivity such driving is impossible, besides inhabitants of these apparatus should test huge overloads. From the point of view of model transerfinga here there is nothing supernatural. Aliens at all do not test an overload because UFOS do not fly, like our planes and missiles. Most likely, we watch driving not the object, and its implementation in room of alternatives.
In the problems concerning soul and reason, also there is a lot of an obscure. The materialistic science introduces the world as mechanistic system. In other words, the substance is primary and spots consciousness. In the light of the last reachings of the same science the yielded model loses the stands more and more. However, the gang of models will be iterated again and again if the person inaccurately supposes that can penetrate into the essence of fundamental nature laws. With the same success the chicken can state the concept of origin, a constitution and poultry farm development. The person in the intellectual development costs on a step above, but the infinite complication of the world becomes closer from it not. All is not let to the person know and to perceive.
The science and religion floating levers claiming for finite instance of true, have conquered the domination not so much at the expense of the correct expounding of true, how much at the expense of persecution of all far-outers. Constant enmity exists not only between science and religion floating levers generally, but also between separate branches in these floating levers. Battle does not stop. But this battle goes not for true, and for committers.
When I justified disability of a brain to store all information, I started with model of information representation in the form of computer bits. But this model can be at all inapplicable to brain neurons. Who knows, how this information actually is stored? Introduce, as though researched the TV set the scientist of that epoch when there was no television and the radio? It would try to push push buttons, to drag miscellaneous details and to watch, what changes happen on the shield. Without knowing an operating principle of the TV set and being grounded on effects of the "scientific" observations, such scientist would come to various outputs in which one bottom one fact, apparently, not subject to doubt would lie: the TV set itself oscillates all these telecasts. They are born there, in these trss and chips.
Approximately in the same way committers of mechanistic model research a brain of the person. Really, cultivation of a stray patch of a brain by a predicted fashion affects perception and psychics. The operating principle of human intelligence as before remains unsolved. Nevertheless committers draw a conclusion, what exactly the substance spots consciousness, and in any way differently. Conservative followers of mechanistic model, it is proud terming itself as scientists, haughty state: they are engaged in an original science which one is grounded on the fact sheet, instead of conjectures of laymans. All not contained in theory frameworks is declared antiscientific and not simply swept aside, and subjected to persuit. Fortunately, such becomes ever less.
You can argue or agree with it, only do not forget that it only model. As all happens actually, nobody knows. The reason can reject that is not laid down in frameworks of reasonable explanations. Until the reason will not be convinced of rationality of knowledge, it will not take in it in the gauge of outlook. transerfing, unconditionally, works, but that it to use, it is necessary to have though any explanation for reason.
The model of alternatives gives the chance to us to feel soil underfoot. But no more that. It remains only the circuit. It can be converted to other, more refined model. For example, it is possible to discard an allowance that there are so-called lines of life, it easied understanding in a book initiation. Then the room of alternatives is transmuted from discrete into the continuous. Paths in working scaffolds are not present more, there are primely working scaffolds. However the essence transerfinga from it does not change. What model was, it will be only more or less adequately to mirror a reality. The trajectory of knowledge of a reality is perpetual, as forms of implication of a reality are infinite.
Was possiblly, you will mark for yourselves that principles transerfinga have something in common with principles of other similar teachings. In it there is nothing surprising. Any teaching is rather closed in itself and is self-sufficient model. But as all of us we are people with approximately equal outlook on quality so far as also models can have similar fields. Is useless to ask a problem what of them features the world more adequately. Meaning has only what practical effects can be extracted from this or diverse formation sample.
To take, for example, mathematics. Various industries of mathematics represent separate models of the specification statement of material implementation. The same physical task can be solved in several ways, applying miscellaneous mathematical apparatus. There is no sense to argue that is better — an analytical geometry or differential calculus. It is possible to select only that it is more to liking. Make also you the select.